Hi,
Ya, I state that property is a low risk investment cause when it compare with others investment method in market like equity, trust fund those high risk high return and short term investment item. I think property is low risk because of the appreciation of land value. In term of accounting book value, we will depreciate the value of property year by year, but it only applicable to the building build on top of the land. In fact the land will only appreciate.
Let see another assumption.
10 ac of land developed a luxury residential building. Unfortunately, the demand is low due to location or some others issues. Then the investor who had purchased those properties are said lost in this investment item. Instead of declare as lost, I prefer to name it as lower return or slower return. Because those properties still have it value although is not as high as the investor expectation, and the land value will still appreciate year by year. The investor will not totally lost his money. In other hand, the investor possible lost all his money if he bought equity share and then the company bankrupt.
So, the risk in property investment can said is compare among property quality. Some property bring high return, some are not.
Thanks for your feedback, I got 3 important point from your reply and i hope i get it rightly. First, you mention about the source of financial. If totally self sponsor then the risk of getting into financial problem will be omited. Second, you compare between residential and commercial property. \"people always need a place for living\", but not everyone need a office. So the risk and return of invest in commercial property can say is higher than residential. Thirdly, you mentioned that prime area and less prime area. This can explan why KL property's value always higher than kedah.
I am interesting about the volatility u mentioned. izzit a method of measuring risk? I'll find out more regard this. Thanks for sharing!